If you've been denied Social Security disability and you're waiting on a hearing, here's something that might surprise you: the hearing office assigned to your case can have a bigger impact on your outcome than the actual strength of your medical evidence. Not a little impact. A lot.

The national average approval rate at the ALJ (Administrative Law Judge) hearing level was about 58-59% in FY2025. But individual hearing offices ranged from a high of 84.8% down to 41.6%. Individual judges within those offices have an even wider spread, from roughly 20% to over 90%, on cases that are supposed to be evaluated under the exact same federal standards.

That's not a small variance. That's the difference between your claim being more likely to get approved versus more likely to get denied, based almost entirely on geography. This guide covers the full FY2025 data, what drives those differences, and what you can do about it.

Data source: All approval rate data in this article comes from the SSA's publicly available ALJ Disposition Data for FY2025, published at ssa.gov/appeals/DataSets/03_ALJ_Disposition_Data.html. Total ALJ dispositions in FY2025: 427,905 cases.

The National Picture: What the 2025 Numbers Look Like

In FY2025, ALJs handled 427,905 total case dispositions nationwide. The national average fully favorable approval rate came in at approximately 58.3-59.1% depending on how you calculate it. The national denial rate was around 29%, with the rest being dismissals or partial decisions.

That national average of roughly 58-59% sounds reasonable on its face. A little over half of people who make it to a hearing get approved. That's actually a much better shot than the initial application stage, where the national approval rate is only about 38%. This is a big part of why attorneys and advocates consistently tell people to keep appealing. The odds improve significantly once you get in front of a judge.

But that national average disguises an enormous amount of variation underneath it. Two applicants with nearly identical medical records and work histories can face dramatically different odds depending purely on which office handles their case.

How the Hearing Process Works

Before diving into the data, it helps to understand how you get to a hearing in the first place. The Social Security disability process has multiple levels, and hearings are the third.

  1. Initial application. You apply for SSDI or SSI. A state agency (Disability Determination Services) reviews your claim and approves or denies it. About 38% of claims are approved at this stage.
  2. Reconsideration. If denied, you can request reconsideration, where a different reviewer looks at your case. Only about 15% of reconsideration requests are approved. Most states require this step before you can request a hearing.
  3. ALJ hearing. If denied at reconsideration, you can request a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. This is where that 58-59% approval rate applies. You appear before the judge (either in person or by video), present your evidence, and the judge issues a written decision.
  4. Appeals Council. If denied by the ALJ, you can appeal to the SSA's Appeals Council in Falls Church, VA.
  5. Federal court. If the Appeals Council denies you, you can file a lawsuit in federal district court.

When you request a hearing, your case is assigned to the hearing office that covers your home address. You don't get to pick the office, and within the office, judges are assigned administratively. You generally can't choose your judge either. If you move to a different area, your case can transfer to the new local office, but that's not a practical strategy for most people.

Hearings can be held in person at the hearing office, or by video. Video hearings have become much more common since 2020. The judge will have your file, your medical records, and usually a vocational expert present. The hearing typically lasts 30 to 60 minutes.

Not Sure Where You Stand?

Before you wait months for a hearing, check whether you might qualify for benefits now. Our free screener takes about 2 minutes.

See If You Qualify →

Top 15 Highest Approval Rate Hearing Offices (FY2025)

The offices at the top of the list are approving cases at rates that are 20 to 25 points above the national average. Ponce, Puerto Rico leads the country at 84.8%, meaning nearly 9 out of 10 people who have a hearing there get approved. That's a fundamentally different experience than what happens in the lowest-performing offices.

Rank Hearing Office State Approval Rate Est. Wait Time
1 Ponce Puerto Rico 84.8% 7-9 months
2 Queens New York 80.2% 9-11 months
3 Long Island New York 75.3% 9-11 months
4 Oklahoma City Oklahoma 73.3% 8-10 months
5 Charlotte North Carolina 73.1% 8-10 months
6 Mobile Alabama 73.0% 8-10 months
7 Spokane Washington 72.0% 7-9 months
8 Chattanooga Tennessee 71.2% 8-10 months
9 South Jersey New Jersey 70.8% 9-11 months
10 Fort Myers Florida 70.5% 8-10 months
11 San Juan Puerto Rico 70.1% 7-9 months
12 Huntington West Virginia 69.8% 8-10 months
13 Memphis Tennessee 69.5% 8-10 months
14 Tupelo Mississippi 68.9% 8-10 months
15 Raleigh North Carolina 68.4% 8-10 months

You'll notice a few things looking at this table. New York shows up twice in the top 5, with Queens at 80.2% and Long Island at 75.3%. Puerto Rico has two of the top offices in the country. The South is well represented. Mobile, Chattanooga, Tupelo, and Raleigh all land in the top 15. These aren't all the same type of region or economic environment, which tells you the variation isn't explained purely by regional poverty or case severity.

Bottom 15 Lowest Approval Rate Hearing Offices (FY2025)

The bottom of the list is just as striking as the top. Little Rock, Arkansas approved only 41.6% of cases, barely above a coin flip. Springfield, Missouri came in at 42.0%. These offices are approving cases at rates roughly 17 percentage points below the national average.

Rank Hearing Office State Approval Rate Est. Wait Time
163 Little Rock Arkansas 41.6% 9-11 months
162 Springfield Missouri 42.0% 9-11 months
161 Charlottesville Virginia 45.4% 10-12 months
160 Harrisburg Pennsylvania 45.8% 10-12 months
159 Orland Park Illinois 47.2% 10-12 months
158 Milwaukee Wisconsin 47.9% 10-12 months
157 Hattiesburg Mississippi 48.1% 9-11 months
156 Colorado Springs Colorado 48.3% 10-12 months
155 Ft. Lauderdale Florida 48.5% 10-12 months
154 Florence South Carolina 49.2% 9-11 months
153 Lawrence Massachusetts 49.5% 12+ months
152 Fresno California 49.7% 12+ months
151 Phoenix Arizona 50.1% 10-12 months
150 Reno Nevada 50.4% 10-12 months
149 Sacramento California 50.9% 10-12 months

Florida is a good example of how much variation exists within a single state. Fort Myers comes in at 70.5%, ranking in the top 10 nationally. Ft. Lauderdale is down at 48.5%. That's a 22-point gap between two offices in the same state. If you live in Fort Myers, you're at a significant statistical advantage compared to a claimant in Ft. Lauderdale with an identical case.

Mississippi also shows up on both ends. Tupelo is in the top 15 at 68.9%, while Hattiesburg is near the bottom at 48.1%. Same state, same federal standards, 20-point gap.

Key takeaway: The variation within a single state is often as large as the variation between different states. Where you live within a state can matter just as much as which state you're in.

State-by-State Snapshot: How Average Approval Rates Compare

State-level averages smooth out the within-state variation, but they're still useful for getting a sense of the general environment in different parts of the country. Here's a look at 15 states, comparing their approximate FY2025 average hearing approval rates to the national baseline.

State Approx. State Average vs. National Avg (58.3%) Notable Offices
Puerto Rico 77.4% +19.1 pts Ponce 84.8%, San Juan 70.1%
New York 70.1% +11.8 pts Queens 80.2%, Long Island 75.3%
New Jersey 64.1% +5.8 pts South Jersey 70.8%
Tennessee 63.8% +5.5 pts Chattanooga 71.2%, Memphis 69.5%
Alabama 63.2% +4.9 pts Mobile 73.0%
North Carolina 62.4% +4.1 pts Charlotte 73.1%, Raleigh 68.4%
West Virginia 62.1% +3.8 pts Huntington 69.8%
Washington 61.5% +3.2 pts Spokane 72.0%
Oklahoma 60.7% +2.4 pts Oklahoma City 73.3%
Florida 58.6% +0.3 pts Ft. Myers 70.5%, Ft. Lauderdale 48.5%
Pennsylvania 54.2% -4.1 pts Harrisburg 45.8%
Illinois 53.8% -4.5 pts Orland Park 47.2%
Wisconsin 53.1% -5.2 pts Milwaukee 47.9%
Missouri 52.4% -5.9 pts Springfield 42.0%
Arkansas 47.9% -10.4 pts Little Rock 41.6%

Florida's state average looks fine at 58.6%, just barely above the national average. But that average is masking a 22-point gap between its best and worst offices. The state average is useful context, but it won't tell you what your specific office looks like. Always look up the specific hearing office that would handle your case.

Wondering About Your Chances?

Understanding your hearing office's approval rate is one piece of the picture. Use our free eligibility screener to see where you stand on the qualification side.

See If You Qualify →

What Drives the Variation in Judge Approval Rates?

This is the question that doesn't have a single clean answer. Several factors contribute to why one office approves 84% of cases while another approves only 41%.

Individual Judicial Philosophy

ALJs are federal employees, but they're also human beings with individual perspectives on what constitutes a disabling condition. Some judges give substantial weight to a treating physician's opinion about what a claimant can and can't do. Others are more skeptical and rely more heavily on independent medical examiners hired by the SSA.

Some judges are particularly tough on cases involving primarily subjective symptoms like chronic pain, fibromyalgia, or mental health conditions, where objective testing has limitations. Others take a broader view of the evidence. These philosophical differences are real and they show up in the data.

Case Mix by Region

Different regions tend to have different populations of claimants with different types of conditions. An office in a rural, industrial area may see more musculoskeletal and repetitive-strain cases. An urban office might have a higher concentration of mental health claims. Since approval rates differ significantly by condition type, the mix of cases flowing through an office will affect its aggregate approval rate even if every judge in that office is applying the rules identically.

Caseload and Staffing

Offices with heavier caseloads and longer backlogs sometimes develop different processing patterns. The SSA has made significant progress reducing the overall backlog. It's down about 30% since June 2024, but individual offices still vary significantly in how many cases each judge handles per year. Very high caseloads can change how thoroughly each case gets reviewed.

Local Economic Context

The SSA's listing of impairments and their five-step evaluation process is supposed to be uniform nationwide. But the vocational expert testimony about what jobs are available (a critical part of many decisions) can reflect local labor market realities. In areas with very limited job options, the practical question of whether someone could actually find work with their limitations can look different than in a major metropolitan labor market.

Attorney Representation Rates

Offices and regions where higher percentages of claimants have representation tend to see better aggregate outcomes, because represented claimants present better-developed cases. If one office's applicant pool is systematically less represented than another's, that will show up in the aggregate approval rate even if the individual judges are applying the same standards.

How to Look Up Your Specific Judge's Approval Rate

The SSA publishes individual judge-level data, not just office-level summaries. You can find it at ssa.gov/appeals/DataSets/03_ALJ_Disposition_Data.html. The data is released in Excel format and includes each judge's name, their hearing office, and their breakdown of fully favorable, partially favorable, and unfavorable decisions.

Here's what you'd look at to understand a judge's tendencies:

  • Fully favorable rate. This is the percentage of cases where the judge approved the claim entirely, awarding benefits back to the alleged onset date. Higher is better from a claimant's perspective.
  • Partially favorable rate. This means the judge approved benefits but with a later onset date or different benefit amount than requested. Still a win, but sometimes means less back pay.
  • Unfavorable rate. The denial rate. This is the number to watch.
  • Total dispositions. Judges with very few dispositions in a given year may have less meaningful statistics, because small sample sizes produce more variable rates.

If you have an attorney or advocate, they should pull this data as a standard part of hearing preparation. It helps them tailor how the case is presented to account for that specific judge's known patterns and concerns.

Can You Change Your Assigned Judge?

Generally, no. The SSA assigns judges administratively and doesn't allow claimants to select or avoid specific judges. This is by design. If applicants could shop for the highest-approving judges, it would undermine the process.

That said, you do have a few options worth understanding:

Request to change hearing office if you move. If you genuinely relocate to a different area before your hearing, your case can transfer to the new hearing office. This is a legitimate option if you're actually moving for other reasons, and it can result in assignment to an office with different characteristics. But moving specifically to access a different hearing office isn't something most people can realistically do.

Request recusal in very specific circumstances. If you have documented evidence of a conflict of interest or bias involving your specific assigned judge, you can request that the judge recuse themselves. This is rare and requires a real documented basis. Simply disliking the judge's reputation or statistics isn't grounds for recusal.

The best strategy is preparation, not avoidance. Since you can't choose your judge, the most practical approach is to build the strongest possible case for whoever you're assigned. That means strong medical evidence, treating physician support, and good representation.

Wait Times: The Other Variable That Differs by Office

Approval rates aren't the only thing that varies. The time from requesting a hearing to actually having one also differs significantly by office.

The national average wait is about 11 months. But some offices schedule hearings in 6 months. Others, like Lawrence, MA and Fresno, CA, have historically had waits of 12 months or longer. If you're at a high-backlog office, you could be waiting a full year or more just to get in front of a judge.

This matters financially. If you're waiting on an SSDI decision and you've already been denied twice, every month of delay is another month without income. If you're thinking about the full picture of how long Social Security disability takes, the hearing wait time is usually the longest single piece of the whole process.

The overall backlog has improved substantially since 2024. The SSA has added hearing capacity and reduced pending cases by about 30% since June 2024. But individual office backlogs still vary significantly, and some offices remain much slower than others.

Example: Two Claimants, Very Different Experiences

Claimant A lives in Queens, NY. Her case is assigned to the Queens hearing office. Average approval rate: 80.2%. Typical wait: 9-11 months. If she's represented and has solid medical records, she's in a good position statistically.

Claimant B lives in Little Rock, AR. His case is assigned to the Little Rock hearing office. Average approval rate: 41.6%. Typical wait: 9-11 months. He's applying for the same benefits under the same federal rules, but statistically speaking, he's going into his hearing at a much steeper disadvantage.

The difference is not in the law. The rules are the same. The difference is in how those rules are being applied in that specific office and by those specific judges. Both claimants benefit from strong representation and thorough medical documentation, but Claimant B needs to understand from the outset that the bar is higher at his office, and prepare accordingly.

Why Variance Within a State Often Beats Variance Between States

One of the most counterintuitive things about the hearing office data is that the variation within a single state is usually larger than the variation between state averages.

Mississippi is a perfect example. The state has two hearing offices that couldn't be more different. Tupelo is one of the top-approving offices in the entire country at 68.9%. Hattiesburg is near the bottom at 48.1%. The state average sits somewhere in the middle and tells you almost nothing useful about what will happen at either specific office.

Florida shows the same pattern. New York, California, and Pennsylvania all have significant within-state variation too. This is why looking at state rankings or state averages without drilling into the specific office level will give you a misleading picture.

If someone tells you "Florida is a tough state for disability hearings," that's not really accurate. Fort Myers is one of the most favorable offices in the country. Ft. Lauderdale is below the national average. "Florida" isn't the right unit of analysis. The specific office is.

Tips for Winning at Your Hearing Regardless of Your Judge

You can't pick your judge or your office. But you can control how prepared you are. Here's what makes a real difference.

Get Represented Before Your Hearing

This is the single most impactful thing on the list. Represented claimants win at higher rates than unrepresented ones, consistently. Most disability attorneys charge nothing upfront and work on contingency. If you win, they take 25% of your back pay, capped at $7,200 by federal law. If you lose, you pay nothing. That's a low-risk way to add significant expertise to your case. Read more about how to win your Social Security disability hearing for details on what a good representative does.

Build Your Medical Record Before the Hearing

Judges decide based on evidence. The more complete, consistent, and current your medical record is, the better your case looks. Make sure your doctors are documenting your functional limitations, not just your diagnoses. A diagnosis of back pain tells the judge you have back pain. A treatment note saying you can't sit for more than 20 minutes at a time, can't lift more than 10 pounds, and need to lie down for 2 hours every afternoon tells the judge why you can't work.

Get a Residual Functional Capacity (RFC) Opinion from Your Doctor

An RFC form asks your treating physician to document specifically what you can and cannot do in a work setting: how long you can sit, stand, walk, how much you can lift, how often you need breaks, whether your condition causes you to be off-task or absent from work. A well-completed RFC from a treating physician who knows your history carries significant weight with most ALJs. Ask your doctor to complete one well before your hearing date.

Prepare for the Vocational Expert's Testimony

Most hearings include a vocational expert (VE) who will testify about jobs you could theoretically still perform given your limitations. The ALJ will pose hypothetical questions to the VE. Your attorney will have the chance to cross-examine the VE with alternative hypotheticals that incorporate your full range of limitations. Cases are frequently won or lost at this step. Understanding this dynamic in advance, and making sure your attorney is ready for it, is critical.

Be Specific and Consistent in Your Testimony

When you testify about your limitations, be specific. Instead of "I can't stand for long," say "I can stand for about 10-15 minutes before the pain becomes severe enough that I need to sit down." Instead of "I have trouble concentrating," say "I lose focus after about 20 minutes and need to take a break." Specific answers with time frames and concrete examples are more credible and more useful to the judge than vague general statements. Make sure your testimony is consistent with what's in your medical records too. Inconsistencies give judges reasons to doubt credibility.

Review Your File Before the Hearing

You have the right to review your complete SSA file before your hearing. Your attorney should do this as a matter of course. Reviewing it helps you identify any missing medical records, incorrect information, or prior determinations that might affect your case. It also helps you prepare for any negative evidence in the file that the judge might raise.

For more on this, read the full guide on how to win your Social Security disability hearing and the overview of Social Security disability benefits.

What Happens If You Lose at the Hearing Level

If your ALJ hearing results in a denial, you still have options. You can appeal to the SSA's Appeals Council within 60 days of the decision. The Appeals Council reviews whether the ALJ made a legal error or applied the rules incorrectly. They can reverse the decision, send it back to the ALJ for reconsideration, or affirm the denial.

If the Appeals Council denies you, you can file a lawsuit in federal district court. Federal court reviews are focused on whether the SSA followed its own rules correctly, not on re-weighing all the evidence. Some cases are remanded back to the ALJ level through this process, which gives another shot at a favorable decision.

For information on what you might be owed in back pay if you do get approved, read the guide on how Social Security disability back pay works. For info on common mistakes that can sink a claim at any stage, see disability claim mistakes that get you denied.

The key point about the appeals process is that persistence matters. The data shows approval rates increase as you move up the appeal levels. The initial stage approves about 38%. The ALJ hearing level approves about 58-59%. Fighting through the process pays off statistically for claims with genuine medical support.

The Bottom Line on Hearing Office Data

The SSA's ALJ data shows that where you live affects your odds at a hearing more than it should. Ponce, PR at 84.8% and Little Rock, AR at 41.6% are operating under the exact same federal rules. That 43-point gap reflects the reality that administrative adjudication (even in a federal program with detailed rules) is still subject to significant human and regional variation.

You can't change your assigned office or judge. But you can control how ready you are. Good medical documentation, a treating physician's RFC opinion, strong representation, and thorough hearing preparation are the variables that are actually in your control. For people at lower-approving offices, those factors matter even more, because there's less margin for error.

Use the free disability eligibility screener to get a quick read on where your case might stand. And if you haven't looked into representation yet, it's worth exploring before your hearing date arrives.

Don't Go to Your Hearing Unprepared

Knowing your office's approval rate is the first step. The second step is making sure your case is as strong as possible before you walk in. Start with our free eligibility check.

See If You Qualify →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the national average approval rate for Social Security disability hearings?

The national average ALJ approval rate for FY2025 was approximately 58-59%. That means a little over half of all claimants who make it to an ALJ hearing get approved. This is meaningfully higher than the initial application approval rate of around 38%, which is why it's worth appealing a denial all the way to the hearing level.

How much do approval rates vary between hearing offices?

The variation is enormous. In FY2025, the highest-approving office (Ponce, PR) approved 84.8% of cases, while the lowest (Little Rock, AR) approved just 41.6%. That's a 43-percentage-point gap between the best and worst offices, on cases evaluated under the exact same federal rules. Individual judge approval rates within offices span an even wider range, from roughly 20% to over 90%.

Can I choose which hearing office or judge handles my case?

Generally, no. Your case is assigned to the hearing office that covers your home address, and within that office, judges are assigned administratively. You can't pick your judge. If you move to a different area before your hearing, your case can transfer to the hearing office for your new address, but that's the only legitimate way to change offices. You can't request a different judge based on approval rate statistics alone.

Why do some judges approve far more cases than others?

Several factors play a role. Individual judicial philosophy matters. Some judges are more skeptical of subjective symptoms like chronic pain while others give more weight to treating physician opinions. The mix of case types in a given region differs. Local economic conditions affect vocational expert testimony. And representation rates differ across regions. The federal rules are uniform, but their application involves significant human judgment.

Where can I find my judge's individual approval rate?

The SSA publishes ALJ disposition data publicly at ssa.gov/appeals/DataSets/03_ALJ_Disposition_Data.html. The data includes each judge's total dispositions, fully favorable, partially favorable, and unfavorable decision rates. Your disability attorney should be familiar with this data and can pull your specific judge's statistics as part of hearing preparation.

How long does it take to get a disability hearing scheduled?

The national average wait is about 11 months from when you request the hearing. But it varies significantly by office. Some offices schedule hearings in as little as 6 months. High-backlog offices like Lawrence, MA and Fresno, CA have historically had waits of 12 months or longer. The overall backlog has improved about 30% since June 2024, but individual office wait times still vary considerably.

Does having a disability attorney actually improve my chances?

Yes, consistently and significantly. Represented claimants have notably higher approval rates at the hearing level than those who go it alone. A good disability attorney knows how to gather the right medical evidence, prepare you for the judge's questions, challenge vocational expert testimony, and handle the procedural details of the hearing. Since most work on contingency with no upfront cost and fees capped at 25% of back pay up to $7,200, the risk-reward calculation strongly favors getting representation before your hearing.